What is the expense ratio of RPV vs TAN?

RPV has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while TAN has an expense ratio of 0.70%.

RPV vs TAN

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco Solar ETF

Last updated: 2026-04-10

RPV Invesco

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is an exchange-traded fund issued by Invesco that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. value stocks trading at below-market valuations. It charges an above-average expense ratio of 0.35%. The fund offers a moderate dividend yield of 2.39%. Launched in 2006, the fund has a 20-year track record.

AUM: $1.7B ER: 0.35% Yield: 2.39% Since: Mar 1, 2006

TAN Invesco

Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is an exchange-traded fund issued by Invesco that provides exposure to thematic - clean energy securities. It charges a high expense ratio of 0.70%. Launched in 2008, the fund has a 18-year track record.

AUM: $1.5B ER: 0.70% Yield: N/A Since: Apr 15, 2008

Quick Verdict

RPV is significantly cheaper at 0.35% vs 0.70% expense ratio, saving you approximately $670 per $10,000 invested over 10 years. Over the past year, TAN has significantly outperformed with a 108.5% return vs 28.4%.

Key Metrics

Metric	RPV	TAN
Expense Ratio	0.35%	0.70%
Dividend Yield	2.4%	N/A
Fund Family	Invesco	Invesco
Category	US Large Cap Value	Thematic - Clean Energy

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

RPV +43.8%

TAN -34.3%

Performance Comparison

Period	RPV	TAN	Difference
1 Month	+0.53%	-0.09%	+0.62%
3 Months	+1.21%	+6.79%	-5.58%
6 Months	+11.76%	+20.21%	-8.45%
YTD	+3.67%	+7.91%	-4.24%
1 Year	+28.36%	+108.54%	-80.18%
3 Years	+40.78%	-26.47%	+67.25%
5 Years	+43.81%	-34.27%	+78.08%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment	Period	RPV Fees	TAN Fees	You Save
$10,000	10 years	$690	$1,359	$670
$10,000	20 years	$2,930	$5,684	$2,754
$10,000	30 years	$9,337	$17,834	$8,497
$50,000	10 years	$3,448	$6,796	$3,348
$50,000	30 years	$46,685	$89,170	$42,485
$100,000	30 years	$93,370	$178,339	$84,969

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric	RPV	TAN
Annualized Volatility	18.1%	39.8%
Max Drawdown	-24.1%	-74.1%
Sharpe Ratio	0.25	-0.13

Dividend Comparison

Metric	RPV	TAN
Annual Dividend (per share)	$2.59	$0.00
Dividend Yield	2.39%	0.00%
Distribution Frequency	Quarterly	None

Top Holdings

0 of top 10 holdings overlap (0% overlap in top holdings)

RPV Top Holdings

Name	Weight
Bunge Global SABG	2.73%
Dow Inc.DOW	2.73%
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyADM	2.19%
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.LYB	2.15%
The Mosaic CompanyMOS	2.02%
Tyson Foods, Inc.TSN	1.93%
Ford Motor CompanyF	1.73%
The Cigna GroupCI	1.72%
General Motors CompanyGM	1.68%
Target CorporationTGT	1.61%

TAN Top Holdings

Name	Weight
First Solar, Inc.FSLR	10.20%
Nextpower Inc.NXT	9.24%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd!tlv/ENLT	6.53%
Enphase Energy, Inc.ENPH	5.87%
Sunrun Inc.RUN	5.21%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.SEDG	5.08%
GCL Technology Holdings Limited!hkg/3800	4.63%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente, S.A.!bme/SLR	4.39%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.HASI	4.33%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd!tlv/DORL	3.47%

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose RPV if...

you want the lowest fees and plan to buy and hold long-term. Over decades, the expense ratio difference compounds significantly.

Choose TAN if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Related Comparisons

DBC vs RPV DBC vs TAN ICLN vs TAN IWD vs RPV LIT vs TAN PDBC vs RPV PDBC vs TAN QQQ vs RPV