IJH vs VOO
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Last updated: 2026-04-10
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is an exchange-traded fund issued by iShares that provides exposure to mid-cap U.S. companies balancing growth potential and stability. It charges a very low expense ratio of 0.05%. The fund offers a moderate dividend yield of 1.26%. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an exchange-traded fund issued by Vanguard that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. equities across growth and value styles. It charges a very low expense ratio of 0.03%. The fund offers a moderate dividend yield of 1.14%. Launched in 2010, the fund has a 16-year track record.
Quick Verdict
VOO has a slightly lower expense ratio (0.03% vs 0.05%), saving about $40 per $10,000 over 10 years. IJH has edged ahead over the past year (31.3% vs 29.7%).
Key Metrics
Performance Chart
Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)
Performance Comparison
Fee Impact Over Time
Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns
Risk Metrics
Based on 5 years of daily returns
Dividend Comparison
Top Holdings
0 of top 9 holdings overlap (0% overlap in top holdings)
IJH Top Holdings
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| TechnipFMC plcFTI | 0.88% |
| Flex Ltd.FLEX | 0.81% |
| Curtiss-Wright CorporationCW | 0.81% |
| United Therapeutics CorporationUTHR | 0.75% |
| XPO, Inc.XPO | 0.75% |
| Woodward, Inc.WWD | 0.71% |
| FabrinetFN | 0.66% |
| Royal Gold, Inc.RGLD | 0.65% |
| MasTec, Inc.MTZ | 0.64% |
| Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS | 0.64% |
VOO Top Holdings
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CorporationNVDA | 7.31% |
| Apple Inc.AAPL | 6.63% |
| Microsoft CorporationMSFT | 4.96% |
| Amazon.com, Inc.AMZN | 3.47% |
| Broadcom Inc.AVGO | 2.56% |
| Alphabet Inc.GOOG | 2.46% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc.META | 2.40% |
| Tesla, Inc.TSLA | 1.92% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK.B | 1.57% |
Which One Should You Choose?
Choose VOO if...
you want the lowest fees and plan to buy and hold long-term. Over decades, the expense ratio difference compounds significantly.